It
is clear that there was an appropriate and recognized style of prophetic
address, and of the introduction to special prophetic utterances.
By attending to this we shall read the prophetic books to
an advantage that cannot be realized by submitting, without thought, to the
superficial guidance of chapter-beginning and chapter-ending. These will be
found of little use in helping us to distinguish separate and distinct
prophecies.
In J In E In the Minor (or Shorter) Prophets, it is "The
word of the L In I An illustrative example of the usefulness of noting these formulæ
is furnished by Isaiah 34 and 35. Most Commentators make chapter 35 commence a
new prophecy, and thus entirely obscure the great issue of the prophecy, which
begins in chapter 34: The Call is to witness Jehovah's J Thus the prophecy is seen to have no break, but forms one
complete and comprehensive whole, embracing these two great parts of one
subject.
In chapter 34 we have the desolation of Edom : wild beasts
celebrate the discomfiture of its inhabitants : then, in chapter 35, the
wilderness and solitary place are seen to be glad; and, as it were, in sympathy
with Divine judgment, the desert rejoices and blossoms as the rose (35: In the result, chapter 35 shows that the People of Jehovah
enjoy the inheritance of the Edomites. Not only are their enemies gone, but so
are the wild beasts which were at once the evidences and tokens of their
judgment. It will have become the way of holiness; the unclean shall not pass
over it; no lion shall be there, but the redeemed shall walk there (35: But all the beauty of this wonderful transition is lost,
when chapter 35 is made the beginning of a new and distinct prophecy; and, more
than this, the difficulty is created by the Hebrew suffix "for them",
in 35: The two chapters (34 and 35) form a comprehensive message,
a matter of world concern : for it combined an implied vindication of the
righteousness of God, and a confirmation of His promise to save His People
Israel with an everlasting salvation.
A failure to recognize the formula of
Isaiah's prophetic utterances led, first, to a misapplication of the chapter,
and then to an unjustifiable disregard of the pronominal suffix.
This typical case of confusion, resulting primarily from an
unfortunate arrangement in chapter-division, suggests the great importance of
care being exercised in a correct individualizing of the prophecies of Holy
Scripture.
1 Without the article. For the expression "THE Son of Man" belongs only to Him Who was "the second man", "the last Adam", the successor or superseder of "the first man Adam" to Whom dominion in the earth is now committed. Compare Genesis 1:26, Psalm 8:1, 9; and verses 4-6, Hebrews 2:8 "not yet". See Appendix 98.